Author Archives: thesecuritieslitigator

Unknown's avatar

About thesecuritieslitigator

I am a securities and commercial litigation attorney located in Boston with years of experience representing companies and individuals in securities, white collar, and civil litigation.

Investment Advisers: Be Prepared for New AML and CIP Requirements.

In coordinated actions, the SEC and FinCEN have proposed changes to the definition of “financial institutions” covered by the BSA to include RIA and ERAs, and to add customer identification program (CIP) requirements for advisory firms. Pointing to the more than $115 trillion RIA space as an entry point for terrorists and other bad actors, the SEC/FinCEN have stated that they are trying to close out this loophole in the compliance regime.

If enacted, RIAs would be subject to the BSA’s AML regime, just like other financial institutions, and would be required to maintain CIPs that, at a minimum, implement reasonable procedures to require customer identity verification. Notably, RIAs can rely on their clearing firm’s CIP program provided that the clearing firm certifies on an annual basis that it has implemented its AML/CIP programs, and meets other requirements. Alternatively, RIAs would have to directly implement their own CIP program.

Timing: The public comment periods for the proposed rules have passed. It is now in the government’s hands to respond and refine the proposals. If the agencies adopt the rules, they would go into effect 60 days after publication in the federal register, with a compliance date 6 months later.

Here is a link to the joint SEC/FinCEN press release.

https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-54

Investment Advisers: FinCEN’s Proposed Rule Requiring AML Compliance Programs

Citing concerns about bad actors using SEC-registered investment advisers (Advisers) to launder money and obtain proprietary U.S. technology information, FinCEN has proposed a rule requiring Advisers to implement an anti-money-laundering (AML) and counterterrorism financing compliance program and to file suspicious activity reports (SARs) with FinCEN. If adopted, the SEC’s examination division would be in charge of assessing Advisers’ AML programs.

Broker dealers and banks have long been subject to such requirements and many Advisers have at least rudimentary AML programs in place. However, Advisers have not been subject to the same level of scrutiny as banks and brokers and, accordingly, may not have fully fleshed out their AML programs. If adopted, Advisers will likely have a grace period in which to implement and enhance their AML programs. Given the speed and pace of innovation by bad actors, Advisers should promptly evaluate their AML programs and look out for additional FinCEN and SEC guidance in these areas.